Nasir al-Deen Albaani is counted among the prominent Salafi scholars of the present era. He has authored numerous books. He was deeply concerned with the prevalence of weak and unreliable traditions. To filter the unreliable narrations, he compiled an encyclopedia of traditions called ‘Silsilah al-Ahaadeeth al-Saheehah’. According to him, all traditions mentioned therein are reliable.
One comes across another work along with Albaani’s research, which illustrates thus:
‘Regarding the narration of Ghadeer – this Hadeeth is among the reliable (Saheeh) traditions narrated by several companions (Sahaaba).
(Al- Sunnah of Ibn Abi Aasim baa Tehqeeq al-Albaani, vol. 2, p. 566)
Albaani has recorded in Silsilah al-Ahaadeeth al-Saheehah:
Hadeeth of Ghadeer has been narrated by Zaid Ibn Arqam, Sa’d Ibn Abi Waqqaas, Buraydah Ibn Hasib, Ali Ibn Abi Talib (a.s.), Abu Ayyub Ansari, Buraa Ibn Aazib, Abdullah Ibn Abbas, Anas Ibn Maalik, Abu Saeed Khudri and Abu Hurayrah.
Commentary:
I Hadeeth-e-Ghadeer has been narrated by five distinct chains of narrators ending in Zaid Ibn Arqam. Each chain is considered reliable by scholars of Rejaal.
II This tradition has been narrated from Sa’d Ibn Abi Waqqaas in three distinct chains; again each chain is considered reliable.
III The tradition of Ghadeer has reached us from Buraydah Ibn Hasib in three chains, all reliable.
IV The Ghadeer tradition has been narrated by Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) vide nine chains of narrators, all of whom are reliable.
In addition to the above:
The comment of Nasir al-Deen Albaani, after noting the various chains of the Hadeeth-e-Ghadeer and accepting it as trustworthy, is both profound and introspective.
He asserts:
‘It should be noted that the purpose behind the in-depth discussion of the Ghadeer tradition and providing the proofs of its reliability is my observation of Shaikh al-Islam Ibne Taymiyyah’s view regarding the Hadeeth of Ghadeer. He (Ibne Taymiyyah) states: “The first part of the Ghadeer narration is weak (i.e. unreliable) and the remaining part is null and void…and in my opinion the comment of Shaikh al- Islam is superficial. In an inordinate haste to arrive at a conclusion about the weakness of the hadith of Ghadeer, he ignored taking into consideration the reliability of its chains of narrators.”
(Silsilah al-Ahaadeeth al-Saheehah, H. No.1750)
Note:
The confession of Sheikh Nasir al-Deen Albaani with regards to the reliable nature of the Hadeeth of Ghadeer underscores the fact that there is no deceit or error in the transmission of the tradition of Ghadeer. His comment on Shaikh al-Islam Ibne Taymiyyah’s view on the Hadeeth i.e. ‘the first part of the Ghadeer narration is weak (unreliable) and the remaining part is null and void…’ is that Shaikh al-Islam has made an inaccurate conclusion and bent on disguisingtruth as falsehood. Clearly, his intent is to mislead generations of Muslims and ruin their hereafter.
Jabir Ibn Abdullah Ansari narrates – Once I had gone on a journey to Syria.…
Muslims go all out to prove how so and so companion was superior or how…
Some Muslims claim that Ameerul Momineen Ali Ibn Abi Talib (a.s.) did not defend the…
Some so-called Muslims accuse the Shias, baselessly and absurdly, of exaggerating the position of the…
The Shiite view on infallibility is challenged by the Muslim majority under the pretext of…
Looking at the ups and the downs encountered by the history of Islam, one is…